WebDick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd. D car vendors said car had done 20,000 miles but had actually done 100,000 - court held this was a term and the innocent bystander would infer a warranty. Notts Patent Brick and Tile Co v Butler. WebDick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] EWCA Civ 2; Interpreting contracts in English law; Notes
Term or Mere Representation Carlil & Carbolic - Law Study …
WebDick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd. The case of Dick Bentley v Harold Smith Motors also involved the sale of a car, but in this case it was a car dealer selling to a private individual (the claimant). The defendant had told the claimant (relying on the odometer reading) that the car had only done 20,000 miles and this was one ... WebDICK BENTLEY PRODUCTIONS, LTD. AND ANOTHER v. HAROLD SMITH (MOTORS), LTD. One of the most confusing areas of the modern English law of contract is that … ordered a received b
Contract Law cases Level 6 Flashcards Chegg.com
WebDOI link for damages for breach of warranty on the ground that the defendant had made a statement about mileage which proved to be false: Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] 1 WLR 623, p 627 WebDick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith Ltd. Point of Law: When is a statement a term (superior knowledge) Facts: H sold car to D, claiming it had only gone 20000 since receiving replacement engine and gearbox. It had actually gone 100000 Def: It was merely a representation. I believed it to have gone for 20000 WebIn Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors (1965) (CoA) when Dick Bentley Productions bought a car from Harold Smith Motors it was sold as only having done … ordered a package but im going on vacation