Web10 Aug 2010 · The Court answered the second question in the negative, refusing to adopt the stray remarks doctrine for California state courts. Reid was hired by Google as Director of Operations and Director of Engineering in 2002 at age 52. He worked at Google for less than two years before he was terminated. In his first and only performance review given ... Webremarks” doctrine to discrimination cases in California. The court reasoned that a categorical exclusion of “stray remarks” resulted in courts impermissibly “weighing” …

CA Supreme Court Rejects Federal Doctrine, Allows ‘Stray …

Web12 Aug 2010 · In a long-awaited ruling, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Reid v.Google on August 5. The Court unanimously held that the “stray remarks” doctrine, which has long been an established evidentiary objection in federal court discrimination cases, is “unnecessary” in California court cases, and that its “categorical exclusion” of … WebOn Aug. 5, the California Supreme Court in Reid v. Google, 10 C.D.O.S. 10019, de-clined to adopt the federal “stray remarks” doctrine, endorsed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Price … fanshawe contact number

Case Western Reserve Law Review

Web17 Nov 2010 · It is very difficult to control everything employees say in the workplace, and to stamp out every inappropriate comment, particularly in a large workforce. Web12 Oct 2012 · The so-called “stray remarks doctrine” was developed to describe or define comments or remarks made that, although on their face appear to reflect age bias or age animus, are insignicant or immaterial when understood in the context in which they are spoken, and are therefore found not to be sufficient evidence of age bias. One court ( … Web6 Aug 2010 · The California Supreme Court rejected the federal doctrine, developed out of O'Connor's opinion although not mandated by it, of categorically excluding "stray remarks." fanshawe conservation campground